With the National Republican Congressional Committee throwing a little money Jennifer Horn's way, it's worth considering what it would take for the Republican nominee to unseat Democratic incumbent Paul Hodes in his first bid for re-election.
The place to start thinking about this is the top of the ticket. Unless things change drastically in the next three weeks (and hey, who knows?), Horn will have to win some percentage of Obama's vote in the 2nd Congressional District in order to upset Hodes.
Scenario No. 1: Let's consider a scenario very favorable for the Republicans: John McCain defies current polls and carries New Hampshire in a nailbiter, 50 percent to 49 percent.
A one-point McCain victory statewide likely works out as follows in NH-2: Obama wins 51 percent of the vote, McCain 48 percent. This assumes that Obama, like John Kerry four years ago, runs a couple points better here than statewide. (In 2004, Kerry won the state 50-49 and NH-2, 52-47.)
If Obama wins 51 percent of the vote in her district, this means that Horn has to find a way to break off part of the Obama vote for herself. To win her race 50-49, she would have to earn 104 percent of McCain's vote. Conversely, Paul Hodes would have to underperform Obama by 4 percent. A "net" 4 percent of Obama voters would have to swing to Horn as they filled out their ballots. (This analysis assumes that voters fill out their ballots completely, or at least that Obama voters are as equally likely as McCain voters not to do so.)
Four years ago, 4 percent of John Kerry's vote equaled 7,100 votes.
Scenario No. 2: Now suppose Obama's lead melts in the last few weeks of the campaign, but he barely hangs onto a 50-49 victory statewide. In that case, Obama carries NH-2, 52 percent to 47 percent.
Horn's task becomes a bit harder. She now has to earn 106 percent of the McCain vote in order to win a one-point victory. Hodes would have to underperform Obama by 6 percentage points. The Obama "swing vote" to Horn climbs to 6 percent.
Scenario No. 3: Obama carries the Granite State by five points, 52-47. This translates into a nine-point Obama victory in NH-2, 54-45.
In this adverse environment for a Republican, Horn would have to earn 111 percent of McCain's vote. Hodes would have to underperform Obama by 9 percentage points. Roughly one of ten Obama voters have to swing over to Horn. In 2004 terms, that's about 18,000 voters.
That's the dilemma for Horn: In the face of a quite plausible Obama victory in her district, she has to find a way to convince a significant number of Obama voters to fire the incumbent Democratic congressman and install her in his place. For Horn to win, there may well have to be thousands more Obama-Horn voters than McCain-Hodes voters.
When Al Gore lost the presidency in 2000 he grew a beard. When Bill Richardson lost the Democratic primary he too grew facial hair. So perhaps it ... >
Paul Hodes is becoming a real player in Washington. It has been a long time since NH has had a Congressman with the influence he is quickly ... >
Some more back-of-the-envelope analysis of the 2008 results:
What’s especially striking about Barack Obama’s ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
Ted Baxter's wife
Is it me or is Horn the clone of the actress who played Ted Baxter's wife on MTM? I can't think of her name but her wild wide eyes and extreme smile will talking in her faux soft voice just grates on me...
Nice Statistics
Hi Dante -- nice statistics, and analysis! I especially like all your scenarios showing Barack Obama winning. I still peg him for a 7% win in New Hampshire, but as you indicate -- anything can happen. Polls to this point have been merely snapshots, and the scene of a snapshot can change the moment it's taken.
I do think Jennifer Horn is a tough competitor, and while her messaging is off-key, she has a rather effective television advertisement that I've been seeing. Paul Hodes seemed to have communicated better two years ago than this time around, at least in his ads. I urge him and his campaign to let him come across as more than just another Washington Congressperson. I think the same is true of Carol Shea-Porter. Let's not forget "New Hampshire roots."
That's not meant as critcism for either -- I support them, and on issues they're incredible. It's just that the camera, along with fluffy PR advertising campaigns, can mess them up and make them sound too much like "politicians."
The New Hampshire volunteers for both Carol Shea-Porter and Paul Hodes should be listened to more than some public relations company or Washington-based consultants. New Hampshire voters are more experienced than many others at seeing flashy ads since we're exposed to so many, so the more down-to-Earth speak-with-me eye-to-eye(camera) approach has more clout. Jennifer Horn has adopted that in her ad.
I say Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter both win fairly solidly in their races, because voters know they deserve it. BUT, anything can happen!
Post new comment