I have been hearing a lot lately how Republicans are going to take back New Hampshire this year because with John McCain at the top of the ticket the down ballot candidates will be boosted by his popularity amongst Independents.
It sounds like a logical conclusion. John McCain is very popular with the Independents in the Granite State and will give the Republicans a better shot of carrying New Hampshire’s four Electoral College votes than just about any other Republican could.
Here is the problem with the scenario. New Hampshire voters have a long history of being able to separate their votes office to office. New Hampshire Independents are known to lean Republican, but they are truly independent Independents.
A look at the election results over the last few cycles will show how independent the New Hampshire voter really is.
In 2004 John Kerry won New Hampshire with 50% of the vote to George W. Bush’s 49%. The numbers closely reflected John Lynch’s 51% to Craig Benson’s 49%. At a quick glance it appears there would be a correlation there, but the Governor’s race was much more an anti-Benson vote and a poorly run campaign by Benson than a down ballot effect. Looking at the Congressional races gives a much clearer picture on how the New Hampshire electorate was able to distinguish candidates and offices to party loyalty. Jeb Bradley defeated Justin Nadeau 63% to 37% and Charlie Bass beat Paul Hodes 59% to 38%.
In 2002 Craig Benson was able to easily defeat Mark Fernald while John E. Sununu narrowly defeated Jeanne Shaheen. Looking at the Governor’s race along with the two easy congressional wins for Jeb Bradley and Charlie Bass, you would assume John Sununu would have more easily won. But the Independents made a switch from voting Republican to crossing over to support Shaheen enough to keep the race close.
The independence continued in 2000 when Independents voted with the Republicans enough to give George Bush a win for in the Presidential election, Sununu and Bass cruised to easy re-elections in the Congressional races, but Jeanne Shaheen cruised to re-election in the Governor’s race. In what was a strong Republican year, Shaheen should have been in trouble, but the Independent voters again crossed party lines from R to D.
In many purple states such as Ohio, Arizona and Florida history shows the top of the ticket greatly affects down ballot results, but New Hampshire with their strong independent streak and their large Independent voter registration, is an exception to the norm. So while many Republicans are excited thinking this year they will take back the state with John McCain at the top of the ticket, they cannot take that for granted. If Republicans want to take back control of the state they are going to need to show that the electorate got it wrong two years ago. Only time will tell if they will be able to do so.
After being unresponsive in his Strafford County Jail cell and being hospitalized, Dodds is now back in jail and the county attorney wonders aloud ... >
We are giving consideration to changing the name of this feature from the Winners & Losers list to the Winners & ... >
To round out our week of examining the "McCain mystique," let's compare his poll standing in New Hampshire to his polling numbers in ... >
I’m off through July 23 for some much needed rest and relaxation. I'll be heading up to Niagara Falls and Buffalo, and then down to wine ... >
Mcbush
Hey dumb and dumber
2008 will not be like 2000 for if you looked at the vote across the state in 2006 which is the results of the most despised president in modern times , even the old faithful repugs switch sides and will do the same this year on four more years mcbush
that is if his health does not degrade any more for he showing signs now
Hurryupharry
Independent for life
McCain helping?
Fergus, you think that "A competitive race at the top means that state candidates will be judged on their own merits, and that decent Republican candidates running decent campaigns in decent districts will be able to win."
To me, that's an awful lot of if's in one sentence. Considering the republicans in this state haven't shown anything close to being that organized, why should I believe it now?
And to prove my point about that, I've been in this state since 2005 and I was registered as a republican. Not once did anyone contact me from the party on anything.
However, both my wife and I were contacted multiple times from multiple democratic candidates running for president. Seems they want my vote more than the republicans.
If the republican party can't do the basic part of campaigning, like contacting their base, what makes you think they're going to win any races?
So no, I don't think McCain is going to help. The republican party in new hampshire needs more help than just a good presidential candidate.
Paul
dog-eared town
Shaheen 2000
Wally -
Your memory of 2000 seems off. Jeanne Shaheen limped to re-election in 2000 with less than 50% of the vote after flip-flopping on The Pledge (and then she tried to pass a 2.5% sales tax). And Pres Bush only narrowly carried NH, by fewer than 10K votes. It wasn't a great year for either party. It was a competitive year - like '08 is shaping up to be.
Sen. McCain gives NH Republicans two important opportunities in '08. First, McCain starts out as a slight favorite to carry NH. Second, McCain will likely run 20-25 points or more ahead of where the top of the GOP ticket was in '06. A competitive race at the top means that state candidates will be judged on their own merits, and that decent Republican candidates running decent campaigns in decent districts will be able to win. This in itself is a major improvement on the environment Republican candidates faced two years ago, which is why Republicans are likely to have a net gain in seats this year. How many is what remains to be seen.
Sincerely,
Fergus Cullen
Chairman, NH GOP
PS: Hey anonymous posters, show some courage and increase your persuasiveness by signing your name!
Post new comment